Poll of a Billion Monkeys

Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts

Friday, February 09, 2007

Thursday MCWS Briefing 2/8/07

Thursday Military/Crime/Warfare/Security Briefing

Did Dahmer murder Walsh? - A Fascinating theory developed by cold case Detectives and an ex-FBI agent that Dahmer could have possibly killed Adam Walsh. I know for a fact that Dahmer later kept head trophies. This early murder might have been practice.
Additional Link with doubt:

L'il Kim-il - North Korean boy punk Rocks the Macau. I can hardly wait for the sequel.

A Lawman of Virtue

Bring Em In - I guess they do want the Surge. After all it's them being murdered, not American Senators.

Slaughterman - Pig Farmer, or Pig? You be the judge.











From Iraq Pictures:
Mexicans and Meth - Since Meth is primarily a rural and suburban enterprise this is an interesting phenomenon because it says that Mexican gangs are gaining both distribution control and are penetrating into areas far less urban than was the case before.

Armor for the War 0n Bear-Terror - This made me laugh. Out loud.

British Terrorism - A Police state for Muslims. They must have been randomly targeted, Little other explanation for this kind of outrageous behavior by the British authorities. Shame, shame, and unpardonable shame.

Alfonzeroed - Don't Cry for Me Argentina.

The Intel War

Thailand Insurgency


Baghdad: Day Two

New Police Chief: Female

Indictments of Five in Iraq



Thursday, January 25, 2007

Thursday MCWS Briefing 1/25/07

Thursday Military/Crime/Warfare/Security Briefing

ATF: Thefts of Explosives From State and Local Government Storage Facilities

National Virtual Translation Center - Statement from Director during Congressional Testimony.

Bureau fights Gangs in City of Angels - This is long overdue if you ask me.

US-Allied Systems Interoperability - Good Lord, how long have I and my friends bitched about this, and what should be done about it? Almost 6 years after 9/11? I'll believe it when I see it though.

Laser-Microwave Gun

Middle East Cold War - In my opinion it is far from Cold, it's been a Warm War for a long time. But this does provide an interesting analysis of the current state of affairs.

The AU in Somalia








Dulmatin Wounded








Georgian Sting - My first instinct is to link this, at least on the periphery, to the Litvinenko Case. At the time of the poisoning I remarked to an old friend of mine while discussing the case that I didn't think that Litvinenko was the sole target, he may have even been incidental, but that rather that the assassination was part of a larger plot by someone or some concern to distract and/or dismantle a Private Intelligence Network which had probably stumbled across a weapon's smuggling operation while investigating something else, like the War in Chechnya. And it seems the Russians have shut the Georgian end of the investigation down. Being the Russians they would have done this no matter what the situation but it only confirms for me at this point that I may have not been far off the mark with my original analysis. The fact that the arrest was made prior to the poisoning only makes me all the more interested in the instrumentality of the Litvinenko killing as it relates to this type of smuggling operation, the methods employed, sourcing, and the delivery chain/route.

Civilian Corp - It's not really a new idea, my friends and I have kicked around this for a long time, not just with the military but with Law Enforcement. A long time ago I called the idea the Vigilants. But it doesn't matter the variety of nomenclature, I'm just awfully glad to see this kind of idea being discussed openly.

Seale Finally Sealed - Having worked quite a few Cold Cases myself I know that the feeling can be quite satisfying when you reel one in, especially after this much time has passed. But as I was discussing with a friend the other day, "The only real Justice is prevention, everything else is just playing catch-up." Better if this could have been anticipated and prevented, rather than resolved 43 years later. I wish Law Enforcement put as much effort into Crime Anticipation and Prevention, or Counter-Criminality, as the military puts resources into Counter-Terrorism.

Cryptographic Advance - I was reading this White Paper when the possibilities for a new form of cryptographic espionage technique occurred to me. The Steganographic implications are also quite staggering because it means that steganographic images used to transmit secure data could not only be made entirely unique with every image, but that image could potentially shift according to any number of factors, such as time of day, interception device, reading device, source identity, receipt identity, interpolation marks - the applications are practically limitless.

Advanced Global Name Recognition

Hacking High Definition DVD Players


Summary of Update: Amber Alert

Changes were made to the following sections: Incident Information

Incident Information: Evergreen, MT Last seen on Wednesday, January 24th at 7:00PM

Incident Summary: Subject missing from relatives residence on Maple Drive, Evergreen, Montana, Flathead County. Subject was outside residence awaiting parent. Parent went inside momentarily and when returned child was missing.Search commenced soon after and is ongoing

Victim Information:
Victim 1Loic Rogers, White Male, 3 Years Old, 3 feet 0 inches tall, 40lbs., Blonde hair, Blue eyes,.Additional information: Clothing description: Last seen wearing red, white and blue jacket, blue jeans, yellow,green and orange beanie hat, tan leather boots.

Contact Information:Anyone with information is asked to call 911 immediately. You can also call the MT Control Terminal - Justice Help Desk at 1877ambermt or toll free at 1877ambermtor visit http://www.montanaamberalert.com/

Recommended Text Page Message for Internal Broadcast:AMBER Alert Update Loic Rogers in Evergreen MT plate number: More @ montanaamberalert.com

Recommended Voice Message:MT Control Terminal - Justice Help Desk is looking for Loic Rogers.The event occurred at , Evergreen MT on Wednesday, January 24th at 7:00PM.Subject missing from relatives residence on Maple Drive, Evergreen, Montana, Flathead County. Subject was outside residence awaiting parent. Parent went inside momentarily and when returned child was missing.Search commenced soon after and is ongoingVictim 1, Loic Rogers is described as being a 3 year old White male, Blonde hair, Blue eyes, 3'0 40lbs Wearing: Last seen wearing red, white and blue jacket, blue jeans, yellow,green and orange beanie hat, tan leather boots.If you have any information on this incident, please call 911 or contact the MT Control Terminal - Justice Help Desk at 1877ambermt.

For additional information about the victim(s), suspect(s) or vehicle(s) visit http://www.montanaamberalert.com/


Digg!

Save This Page

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Thursday MCWS Briefing 1/18/07

Thursday Military/Crime/Warfare/Security Briefing

Murder and Gang Initiatives

Chinese Satellite Killer - China continues to develop some major new high-tech warfare capabilities. I found this one particularly interesting. What the US will be forced to do eventually is develop countermeasures and perhaps satellite defensive capabilities. Unlike the Soviet Union however, a nation that was crippled by her own lack of economic vision and capability, the Chinese communists understand all too well the very vital and potent link between economic capacity and prosperity and military capability and power.

The Assassin Email

The Digitized Camo - The very first time I saw this design the very first thing I was reminded of was pixilated white noise off of my digital camera screen. I thought the idea absolutely brilliant at first for a static design through which no energy flowed. Fixing on such a camo-ed target at a distance it struck me that perhaps it would cause "fuzz" or distortion which might make the target seem slightly askew of, or displaced from his real position and therefore a more difficult target for snipers to fix upon as just one example. Now I realize after having studied the design for some time that what is actually needed is a design which is energized to create true distortion. Here is an article about troop satisfaction and dissatisfaction in the field with the new camo.

When Good Ideas Smell Bad - This is just the Dick in me I'm sure but something smells all wrong about this, at least at this point in time. Yes, I agree it is a necessary step. It also feels all wrong. I think the flow should be carefully controlled and grandfathered depending upon performance and capability. I got a very bad feeling about just flooding most military and especially police units with more weaponry. This needs to be tracked carefully because Iraq is still Frontier's Law and a Frontier's Combat Zone. My blue sense starts tingling when I think about wide scale weapon dispersements to people and units we may or may not be able to control, or who may or may not remain future allies. I would not have flooded the streets of Berlin with new weapons after World War II to control Nazi insurgents. Not till I was sure the Germans had made the turn-around.

Border Agents Surrender to US Marshals



I don't Know Whether to Laugh, or Cry - Do we really want people like this serving, and who would want to be serving beside them if they were deployed?

Gonna BB an Idiot - Let's just say that it doesn't surprise me.

Bangladesh Crackdown

Last Stand



US Industrial Espionage and Intel

Digg!

Save This Page

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Thursday MCWS Briefing 1/11/07

Thursday Military/Crime/Warfare/Security Briefing

Iraq
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Text of President's Speech on Iraq

Some Military Details of the President's Plan - I will be commenting later today on some of the military details of the plan.

Plan Bullet Points

“The controversy over what to do about Iraq has congealed into two camps: supporters of the President who lack a clear plan for achieving victory, and critics of the President who have a detailed plan for America’s defeat.”

Loren Thompson

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Other News

Helping A Milblogger/Logroller - Help out if you can. He's been through a lot.

92,000 Boost - To me the number seems low. I guess it will depend upon the actual percentage of combat able troops.

Damned, and either way - How right you are.

Elliot Ness - I've always wondered about his direct, or indirect relationship with Federal authorities. A very interesting story.

Bureau Records Declassification

Children Strangled - The method of murder bothers me because of what it implies.

White Pickup - Concerning the seeming kidnapping case.

ASEAN and Myanmar




Kenya detains Somali Al Qaeda Wives - I wish I could get a truly straight, final story on this. Not about the wives, but the Al Qaeda leaders.








Friday, January 05, 2007

Thursday MCWS Briefing 1/4/07

Thursday Military/Crime/Warfare/Security Briefing

US Border War - What we really need is deep infiltration and penetration of these groups on the other side of the Border. I'm for offensive action against ICCs, border gangs, and terrorists along the border.

INDC Embed - We need far more of this kind of thing. We also need far more of our own local embeds from the local population in various parts of the world; Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, Somalia, etc.

The New Ford - It seems extremely fitting to me. Now he's not a Lincoln, he's an Air Craft Carrier.

Realizing Anti-Qaeda

No New Leads in New Year's Eve - I'm with Agam. If it smells like a dead fish, it probably is.

David and Goliath

Intelligence Beyond - Boy, have I been saying this for years.

SIGINT's Clean Sweep - Funny, I hadn't really thought of this in this context till now.

Help Track Fugitive Domestic Terrorists


Digg!

Save This Page

Monday, December 11, 2006

New York Bans Fats From City Transportation System

Marxed - New York Bans Fats From City Transportation System

By Juan Wartina Garcia for the Missal
Last updated: 8:03 PM
Monday, December 11, 2006


Digg!


In a bold move guaranteed to offend many the city of New York has decided to ban fat people from their public transportation system.

Anticipating legal challenges the city has nevertheless approved the ordinance that would bar the calorie challenged from gaining access to public transportation.

At a noon-time press conference outside of City Hall, New York City’s interim Chief of City Transportation Workers, the United 506 Stationaries declared, “We are quite serious in the efforts we are making. We feel that it is in the interest of all New Yorkers, as well as those using our transportation systems from out of town or out of state, to assure the most high quality and efficient experience possible. Public health and decorum demands that we enforce this new ordinance, and I do so gladly. Fat asses are no longer allowed in the jurisdictions of New York City, and they are no longer allowed to make use of our transportation networks. It is the considered opinion of our lawmakers that people of tremendous girth, and current systems of transportation do not mix very well and that our transportation systems are ill-prepared for the strain placed upon them by Whoppers, meaning the belly-boomers, and Whopper Jrs., the fat off-spring of these gargantuan people who never cease eating. America has a serious weight problem my friends, and here in New York City we’re doing something about it. New York has banned all trans-fats and I mean to see that ban properly enforced.”

When questioned further about the ban on trans-fats the Transportation Chief admitted he was unaware of the exact wording of the ordinance or exactly how broadly it might be applied. Nevertheless he insisted that he would apply the ordinance in the broadest possible sense. “If you’re too broad to get through our terminal doorway without use of the Jaws of Life, or you’re so broad that you require a Marine Armored Personnel Carrier as a personal mobility scooter then you’re too fat for the New York subway. Broad means broad and that’s the way I mean to look at it. Try walking more people and eating less whole mammals at a single meal and you should eventually be able to make use of our transportation hubs again. ‘Take a load off and we’ll take your load for you.’ That’s our new transport motto. But if you are a load unto yourself then you’d best haul it yourself, you’ll get no help from us.”

Asked if the City might be opening itself up for endless litigation a spokesman for Mayor Bloomberg released a statement which read, in part, “The City of New York has no business interfering in the private lifestyle choices of the citizens who live here. This is exactly why this ban was created, so that we no longer have any responsibility or liabilities in these matters. We leave it up to individuals by demanding that trans-fats be publicly eliminated. That’s the easiest way to resolve the matter, leave it up to the people to make their own choices and then ban those choices that are bad for them. That’s the way government should work.”

A precinct spokesman for the Police Dept. commenting on background and under condition of anonymity, said that he feared the ban could cause a rise in Black Market Transportation, which could eventually lead to serious problems with crime. “Suppose some Asian gang comes into town and decides they will exploit this situation? They bring in illegal transport slaves and force those slaves to ride these trans-fats around on their backs for practically nothing while the gang makes a killing as some poor little stick armed Cambodian woman is stuck hauling around seven hundred pound fat asses 24/7. We’ll see em dropping like flies in the summer time and who’s gonna have to clean up that mess? The Irish that’s who! Stinking Irish-men, if you ask me that’s who we should be banning. A man might not can help being lazy, shiftless, no-good, and weighing the same as a mini-CAT because he eats in the bed all the time, but at least he ain’t Irish! That’s off the record by the way. Don’t print that. I mean you can use the part about the Irish and the Asians and the fat asses, just don’t attach my name to it. I’m still on my green card and don’t want any heat from those gringos upstairs.”

A spokesman for the Behemoth Brotherhood, a non-profit, high consumption support group says that he feels the ban on trans-fats can be overturned in the courts by a reverse boycott. Asked what a reverse boycott might entail he said that it meant getting several thousand people who weighed six hundred pounds or more down to City Court and that he believed that would either tip the legal balance in their favor or tip the building on its side, thereby forcing the judiciary to reconsider the ban. Asked if he could gather several thousand people who weighed six hundred pounds or more for his reverse boycott he said that he had at least that many in his cream pie and sugar barrel exchange network. The trouble would be, he said, in being able to get all of them to make the six-mile trip to court without first becoming hopelessly diverted by the many doughnut shops and hot dog stands en route and thus forgetting the reason they had left the house in the first place.

This reporter however feels that he has not yet seen the tail end of this story. And if this story is as big as some of the parties I’ve interviewed for background research it may be a long time before the full girth of this weighty issue is entirely expounded.


© JWG, Jr. 2006

Sunday, December 03, 2006

AN EXAMINATION OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CLASSICAL LIBERALS AND MODERN LIBERALS

The Glair - AN EXAMINATION OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CLASSICAL LIBERALS AND MODERN LIBERALS


Digg!


How are the views of the Modern Liberal similar to, and different from, the views of the Classical Liberal? Let’s examine the evidence for a better understanding.


ON JUSTICE

Classical Liberal:
Believed Perfect and Universal Justice in society a noble ideal to be industriously pursued, even if sometimes it can only be imperfectly achieved.
Modern Liberal: Believes the very idea of the pursuit of Justice an imperfect ideal, and therefore not a worthy objective. The only real Justice the modern liberal understands is something they call Social Justice, which is a bizarre and impotent bastardization of the idea of Universal Justice, a sort of “Multi Generational Vengeance” on the Macro, or Group Scale. Does not believe in Justice as normally defined, rather, believes in compensation, courts, and legislation by lawsuit.


ON HUMAN RIGHTS

Classical Liberal:
Believed Human Rights Granted to all Men and Protected by God. Believed in Universal Equality.
Modern Liberal: Believes Rights derived by ever-malleable Human Social Contract, and therefore open to debate as to their nature, extent, and character. Believes some people are capable of liberty and some are better suited to rule by Tyrants, Strongmen, and Dictators.


ON EDUCATION

Classical Liberal:
In general extremely well and Classically educated. Believed in self-education throughout the entire term of their lives.
Modern Liberal: Thinks the modern and current public education system is a brilliantly effective method of education. Doesn’t understand the term self-education, and sees no point to the exercise.


ON LIBERTY

Classical Liberal: Was willing to fight for, in word and deed, his own liberty and the liberty of his fellow man, no matter how long the struggle took or how difficult it might be.
Modern Liberal: Expects liberty to be granted to him as a birthright, but is unwilling to fight for or expand the franchise to his fellow man if any real sacrifice is called for, or any real struggle is involved.


ON RELIGION

Classical Liberal:
Deeply, if often unorthodoxly, religious. Friendly towards expressions of religious liberty in public life. Believed faith based institutions such as churches valuable components of a healthy societal order and public virtue. Believed personal behavior often tied to, and beneficially regulated by, religious belief.
Modern Liberal: Unorthodox and Freakish in personal behavior. Often deeply irreligious. Desires religion and therefore religious liberty expunged from public life. Believes the greatest public virtue is to erase faith as a component of the societal order.


ON EVIL

Classical Liberal:
Feared no evil and believed all evils could be overcome with patience, proper action, and reason.
Modern Liberal: Sees no reason to try to understand the concept of evil. Thinks it a Fairy Tale or subjective psychological construct. Resents recent talk of evil and wishes we could all return to the days of neuter-speak and inoffensive misdefinition.


ON TAXATION

Classical Liberal:
Believed Taxation means and meant exhaustion and therefore taxation should not be imposed unless absolutely necessary for a true and valid function of local, state, or federal government. Did not believe in taxation without representation. Believed individuals made the most productive use of their own resources. Believed taxation should be directed towards what people consume, not what they produce, and that taxes in regards to property should be allodial.
Modern Liberal: Believes the resources of the individual actually belong to the government. Does not believe in any invalid or unproductive government function. Believes representatives should promote ever higher rates of taxation. Believes in a nebulous and non-sequitor term, “Progressive Taxation,” even though the terms progress (to continue or to improve) and tax (to exhaust) are diametrically opposed to one another. Thinks property should be continuously taxed in order that the state, not the individual owns the property in perpetua.


ON MARKETS

Classical Liberal:
Believed Markets should be free and open enterprises and that competition is the mechanism by which both individual and collective industries improve, thrive, and prosper.
Modern Liberal: Thinks prospering is very bad and unjust and that people should be protected from the markets, lest they too profit.


ON INCOME AND WAGES

Classical Liberal: Understood the original and true distinctions in definition between the terms “Income” and “Earnings” and “Wages.”
Modern Liberal: Does not understand what an income is, but thinks it should be tied to the minimum wage, and that earnings should be universally regulated.


ON INITIATIVE AND INVENTION

Classical Liberal:
Was admiring of Personal Initiative and Invention in individuals and considered both necessary qualities of eventual success.
Modern Liberal: Takes the initiative in declaring persons incapable of individual success without assistance from collective groups or governments. Is not impressed by success because it sets an unfair measure of personal achievement that makes it very difficult for the lazy to achieve profitability parity.


ON ENTERPRISE, PROFIT, INDUSTRY, AND DRIVE

Classical Liberal:
Understood the definition of the term Enterprise and that it signified a dangerous and risky undertaking. Understood the concept of “Profit.” Thought a man would succeed or fail based upon his Personal Industry and Drive.
Modern Liberal: Has no concept of an enterprise. Thinks profits are bad and disgraceful and somehow personally and institutionally corrupting. Thinks no one should mention personal and industry in the same sentence. Likes governmentally mandated regulations on both what you drive, and how much drive you should have.


ON CREATIVITY AND ACCOMPLISHMENT

Classical Liberal:
Believed in personal and individual creativity and accomplishment.
Modern Liberal: Thinks creativity occurs by committee, but since they also believe life has no ultimate meaning, personal accomplishments are all illusions anyway.


ON PROBLEM SOLVING

Classical Liberal:
Believed every problem eventually soluble via the careful and consistent applications of reason and industry in the individual.
Modern Liberal: Thinks world is doomed and the individual an impotent cipher incapable of solving his own problems.


ON REASON

Classical Liberal:
Believed the ability to Reason instrumental to success and one of God’s Great Gifts to Mankind.
Modern Liberal: Believes they have successfully reasoned away God.


ON LIFE, HEALTH, AND PROPERTY

Classical Liberal:
Thought a man’s Life, Health, and Property the responsibility of the individual involved and subject to his personal decision making process. Believed very strongly in Personal Responsibility and Accountability.
Modern Liberal: Thinks a man’s health a function of society, his property in eternal escrow to the state, and his life determined by environmental factors and therefore a matter beyond his personal control.


ON PRIVACY AND PERSONAL CONDUCT

Classical Liberal:
Believed a man should be secure and honored in his private opinions, speech, and papers. And that his public conduct should be upright and virtuous.
Modern Liberal: Believes everything a person does should be a private matter even if it involves publicly felonious conduct.


ON SCIENCE

Classical Liberal:
Believed man should morally and materially benefit from the blessings of Science and scientific progress.
Modern Liberal: Believes that the material benefits derived from Science automatically relieve everyone of any cumbersome consideration of the moral ramifications of scientific progress.


ON TOUGHNESS AND HARDIHOOD

Classical Liberal:
Admired the traits of Toughness and Hardihood in individual people.
Modern Liberal: Thinks toughness and hardihood chauvinistic and outmoded expressions of individual behavior. Admires effeminate conduct or at the very least gender-neutral personality expressions in all circumstances.


ON FREEDOM AND LIBERTY

Classical Liberal:
Believed all men could and should enjoy the personal blessings of Freedom and Liberty.
Modern Liberal: Believes Freedom means that they should be at Liberty to do as they please.


ON EQUALITY AND THE LAW

Classical Liberal:
Believed all men are and should be equal under the Law.
Modern Liberal: Believes the Law is a tool for righting perceived political inequalities.


ON OPTIMISM AND PROGRESS

Classical Liberal:
Were highly Optimistic and Progressive in the true sense of the term.
Modern Liberal: Thinks true progress is achieved by properly executed tax schemes, and should be regulated by government. Highly pessimistic and reactionary in most other matters.


ON CHARITY AND PHILANTHROPY

Classical Liberal:
Believed that good could best be done to the unfortunate by acts of private and voluntary Charity and Philanthropy.
Modern Liberal: Thinks the government is the best and most efficient method of distributing charity and philanthropy. This is unfortunately how they think they can best serve the unfortunate.


ON LABOR

Classical Liberal:
Believed if a man was dissatisfied with the rewards of his labor that he should be free to seek better opportunities to fully exploit his personal industry for higher profit.
Modern Liberal: Believes all labor should be unionized so that the worker can best be collectively exploited, and so that profits may be diverted to more deserving persons.


ON CIVIC DUTY AND VOTING

Classical Liberal:
Believed it was the duty of every citizen to vote and to vote with an informed background of information and experience towards both the candidates and the issues.
Modern Liberal: Thinks non-citizens and felons should vote, and vote often – even often in the same election, and that if voters do not understand the actual process and mechanics of voting that their failed intentions to properly execute a vote should be derived by statistical models, the courts, and by political soothsayers and augurs. Issues are secondary considerations in any election for the modern liberal, the important thing is assuring votes are counted or at least construed by psychic process.


ON REPUBLICS AND DEMOCRACIES

Classical Liberal:
Believed the highest form of government to be a Constitutional Republic with Rights guaranteed by God for the good of the people.
Modern Liberal: Thinks Democracy the highest form of government, Constitutions open to “living legislation” by the Judiciary, God an anachronism, and the good of the people best decided and protected in every case by majority vote.


ON CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE

Classical Liberal:
Believed the most important aspects of an individual to be the nature and content of his character.
Modern Liberal: Believes the most important aspects of an individual to be his charisma, charm, and personality.

© JWG, Jr. 2006