Poll of a Billion Monkeys

Friday, September 19, 2014

EPIGENETIC MEMORY

I have been studying the field of epigenetics for about ten years or so now? Something like that. Since the field of genetics has been a personal interest of mine for decades. But I only relatively recently became of aware of modern epigenetics and began studying it in depth.

I see it as being directly related (as a manipulation mechanism) to my theory of the Renaissance Man and the polymath.

Anyway I thought this was a rather good but very basic summary of some of the recent research advances and studies in the field.



Study shows how epigenetic memory is passed across generations

18 hours ago


Study shows how epigenetic memory is passed across generations
This image shows inheritance and transmission of the epigenetic mark H3K27me3 in C. elegans. The 1-cell embryo (left) shows the mark (green) inherited on sperm chromosomes but not on the oocyte chromosomes (pink) contributed by a mutant mother lacking the methylation enzyme PRC2. The 2-cell embryo (right) shows transmission of the mark on the sperm-derived chromosomes in each daughter nucleus. Credit: Laura J. Gaydos
A growing body of evidence suggests that environmental stresses can cause changes in gene expression that are transmitted from parents to their offspring, making "epigenetics" a hot topic. Epigenetic modifications do not affect the DNA sequence of genes, but change how the DNA is packaged and how genes are expressed. Now, a study by scientists at the University of California, Santa Cruz, shows how epigenetic memory can be passed across generations and from cell to cell during development...



Study shows how epigenetic memory is passed across generations

17 hours ago
Study shows how epigenetic memory is passed across generations
This image shows inheritance and transmission of the epigenetic mark H3K27me3 in C. elegans. The 1-cell embryo (left) shows the mark (green) inherited on sperm chromosomes but not on the oocyte chromosomes (pink) contributed by a mutant …more
A growing body of evidence suggests that environmental stresses can cause changes in gene expression that are transmitted from parents to their offspring, making "epigenetics" a hot topic. Epigenetic modifications do not affect the DNA sequence of genes, but change how the DNA is packaged and how genes are expressed. Now, a study by scientists at the University of California, Santa Cruz, shows how epigenetic memory can be passed across generations and from cell to cell during development.


Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-09-epigenetic-memory.html#jCp

Study shows how epigenetic memory is passed across generations

17 hours ago
Study shows how epigenetic memory is passed across generations
This image shows inheritance and transmission of the epigenetic mark H3K27me3 in C. elegans. The 1-cell embryo (left) shows the mark (green) inherited on sperm chromosomes but not on the oocyte chromosomes (pink) contributed by a mutant …more
A growing body of evidence suggests that environmental stresses can cause changes in gene expression that are transmitted from parents to their offspring, making "epigenetics" a hot topic. Epigenetic modifications do not affect the DNA sequence of genes, but change how the DNA is packaged and how genes are expressed. Now, a study by scientists at the University of California, Santa Cruz, shows how epigenetic memory can be passed across generations and from cell to cell during development.


Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-09-epigenetic-memory.html#jCp

THE HUMAN SUIT

And about bloody time too. I've been saying the same thing, and following the same design principle with my own AISTHPLEIS Suit design for over a decade now.

The idea makes far more sense and would be far more efficient and pragmatic than either a bulky, cumbersome diving bell type suit (current designs) or a totally artificial/mechanical robotic machine type exoskeletal suit (current military designs).


Biomechanical, bio-organic, nanobiological, human imitative and human enhancing and direct somatic interfacing technologies such as this are the wave of the future, not old style mechanical and robotic technologies.



Spacesuits of the future may resemble a streamlined second skin

Sep 18, 2014 by Jennifer Chu
Shrink-wrapping spacesuits
The MIT BioSuit, a skintight spacesuit that offers improved mobility and reduced mass compared to modern gas-pressurized spacesuits. Credit: Jose-Luis Olivares/MIT
For future astronauts, the process of suiting up may go something like this: Instead of climbing into a conventional, bulky, gas-pressurized suit, an astronaut may don a lightweight, stretchy garment, lined with tiny, musclelike coils. She would then plug in to a spacecraft's power supply, triggering the coils to contract and essentially shrink-wrap the garment around her body...

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

THE DEATH OF EVERYTHING ELSE

I completely agree. Modern liberalism is obsessed with turning everything else into modern liberalism. To the death and detriment of everything else.


By Photo: Whitney Museum
Do more and more liberals find the emotions unleashed by the artsI mean all of the arts, from poetry to painting to dancesomething of an embarrassment? Are the liberal-spirited people who support a rational public policya social safety net, consistency and efficiency in foreign affairs, steps to reverse global warmingreluctant to embrace art’s celebration of unfettered metaphor and mystery and magic? If you had asked me ten years ago, I would have said the answer was no. Now I am inclined to say the opposite. What is certain is that in our data- and metrics-obsessed era the imaginative ground without which art cannot exist is losing ground. Instead of art-as-art we have art as a comrade-in-arms to some more supposedly stable or substantial or readily comprehensible aspect of our world. Now art is always hyphenated. We have art-and-society, art-and-money, art-and-education, art-and-tourism, art-and-politics, art-and-fun. Art itself, with its ardor, its emotionalism, and its unabashed assertion of the imagination, has become an outlier, its tendency to celebrate a purposeful purposelessness found to be intimidating, if not downright frightening.

The erosion of art’s imaginative ground, often blamed on demagogues of the left and the right, is taking place in the very heart of the liberal, educated, cultivated audiencethe audience that arts professionals always imagined they could count on. The whole question is so painful and so difficult that I have frankly hesitated to tackle it. It is relatively easy to point to the deformations of art at the hands of politically correct left-wingers and cheap-shot moralists on the right, as the late Robert Hughes did in the fast-paced, witty series of lectures that he published as Culture of Complaint in 1993. It is far more difficult to explain why people who pride themselves on their carefully reasoned view of the world want to argue that art is not a value in and of itself, but rather a vehicle or a medium or a vessel through which some other human value or values are expressed. That these thoughts are often voiced indirectly makes them no less significant. Indeed, such thoughts may be all the more significant because they are being expressed by critics and scholars who would deny that they are in any way discomfited by the unique powers of the arts. An illiberal view of art is gaining ground, even among the liberal audience. This is one of the essential if largely hidden factors that is undermining faith in our museums, our libraries, our publishing houses, our concert halls, symphony orchestras, and theater and dance troupes.

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

NASA CATCHES UP TO THE 21ST CENTURY

Good. We should be relying upon American corporations not hostile foreign nations for our Space Exploration endeavours.

On the other hand we shouldn't be relying upon the American government for our Space Exploration efforts either. The future of Space Exploration is Private Enterprise.


Space Race: NASA Awards Contracts to Boeing, SpaceX

PHOTO: NASA astronaut Alvin Drew participates in an EVA on the International Space Station on Feb. 28, 2011.
NASA awarded contracts today to Boeing and Elon Musk's SpaceX to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station, signaling the agency's return to manned spaceflight after the end of the space shuttle program.
"This is the fulfillment of the commitment President Obama made to return human space flight launches to U.S. soil and end our reliance on the Russians," NASA administrator Charles Bolden said.
The winning designs will end U.S. dependence on the Russian Soyuz for transportation back and forth to the International Space Station.

THE ORIGINAL

I have nothing but admiration and respect for Classical Liberalism.


I have nothing but disdain and disgust for modern liberalism.

ONE THING INTO ANOTHER - PRINTER INTO LABORATORY

I very much like the idea of one device having multiple applications (with a small amount of reconfiguring or even retooling).

To me this is a positive step towards God Technology.

Now you can turn your inkjet printer into a chemistry lab and use it to diagnose diabetes

5 hours ago by Mark Lorch, The Conversation
Now you can turn your inkjet printer into a chemistry lab and use it to diagnose diabetes
Ready, set, print me a reaction. Credit: Chaikom
If you stop and think about it for a moment, you will realise what an astonishing feat of precision engineering your colour printer is. It can take the primary colours – cyan, yellow, magenta and black – and mix them together carefully enough to achieve more than a million different hues and shades. Not only that but the drops of colour are mere nanolitres (billionths of a litre) in volume, each of which is then placed on the paper – assuming its not jammed in the feeder tray – with better than pinpoint accuracy...


Thursday, September 11, 2014

WHAT I REMEMBER: 9/11, 2014

This is hardly a day to celebrate, of course, but it is a day to remember so that we may hopefully better foresee the future.
 
What bothers me about this day is not that we were ambushed, for anyone can be, or even that we did not anticipate 9/11/01 (we should have, but humans are humans, we do not anticipate everything, even those things we easily should) but how easily we have dismissed the implications of this day.
 
We are in the very early stages of what may very well promise to be another Hundred Year’s War.
 
Yet so many are still so naïve, so self-absorbed, so easily deluded.
 
They thought this would all be over quickly, won easily, that they could return unabashed and untroubled to their self-indulgent and erroneous political theories and their quaint causes and their video games and their personal interests du jour and that the War on Terror would disappear because they and their self-appointed leaders so desired. Merely because they chose to stop calling it a war. As if anything ever disappears simply by un-naming it.
 
Good luck with that.
 
You’re sure as hell gonna need it.

Evil doesn’t give a shit what you think of it. It doesn’t care what you want. It doesn’t care how complacent or apathetic or naïve or just plain ignorant you desperately desire to be. It doesn’t care who you are. It likes to make martyrs, not be martyred, it likes the weak, it likes the naïve, it likes the apathetic, and it especially loves the overly sophisticated, the urbanized intelligentsia, and wholly self-deluded (I apologize for being redundant, that was just for emphasis). They all make for awful good eating.
 
Evil is what it is folks, and it is a hunter of the unprepared, and it is extremely patient, and it smells blood where you smell your own self-absorption and Danish topped coffee stains.
 
So just get used to it, it is the way of things.
 
You might think war is something you wage on TV and film screens, something that will be won in a single tow-hour fictional combat by Captain America and Batman. You might think it can be won by words and empty suit promises by painted pretty boy Presidents who can’t wipe their own asses for confusing it with a back-nine grass-covered golf hole.
 
But what you’re likely gonna get is something altogether different and more costly than that.

So, get used to it sunshine.

You just have no idea of what’s coming... and how little you yet understand.
 
And God help us, maybe you’ll just get lucky, eh?
 
Then again luck is no more of a plan than Hope and Change.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

For those of you familiar with blogging I have a question to ask. I'd like to solicit your advice.

I have four blogs, one is my personal blog, one is my literary blog, one is my business and invention blog, and one is my gaming and design blog.

Three of my blogs are on Wordpress, one is on Blogger. When each is old enough and well established enough (I just started them a couple of months back) each will go private, but for now they are hosted.

So here is my question: of these two platforms, Wordpress and Blogger, which is better for building your audience and which is better overall if your aim is blog success to support your business and writing enterprises?

At this stage of my blog development process which do you think is the superior platform?

Which do you recommend, and why? Your advice is appreciated.

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

THE MISSAL

I've reinitialized the Missal. The Missal will now become my personal and political and religious blog, though I'll also cover other topics as well, such as military and law enforcement matters. I'll disclose more details later, but for now I'll be making regular blog posts to the Missal once or twice a week again.

I also have other blogs I am currently writing. If you would like to visit one of my other blogs they are as follows:

Wyrdwend : my Literary blog covering my writings - fiction and non-fiction, my songwriting, and my poetry.

Launch Port : my business and entrepreneurial blog covering business, career, entrepreneurship, start-ups, capital and funding, and my inventions.

Tome and Tomb : my gaming and game design blog.


You are welcome to link to or follow any of my blogs. All readers are welcome.

Have a great day,

Jack. 


MISCEGENATION AND ITS UNNATURAL CORRUPTION

I’ve done some research on the term and the etymological history and as far as I can discover miscegenation (see definition, origins and etymology below) is an entirely modern American democrat term. Even though it is Latin in construction I knew the term could not be Latin in origin since the Romans never thought in this way about race (nor has anyone, except the Chinese and Japanese, at least not until modern times, they only thought in relation to Roman citizenship versus barbarian and Greek versus barbarian). It is interesting but totally logical and completely unsurprising that it was a term coined by Democrats in an attempt to supposedly prevent “miscegenation.”

(As an interesting historical sidenote I think that one of the other ways the Democrats tried to prevent miscegenation was to promote the wholesale abortion of blacks by pushing for free, easy, and legalized abortion for all – but targeted mainly at black women. Wholesale abortion and miscegenation would be circular and supporting political aims for the Democrats, modern, and their forefathers in government during the Civil War era.)

Anyway I have long thought about developing a counter-term or a term to replace miscegenation in the English language (since it no longer applies legally, socially, or even politically among democrats) with a term that reflects the advantages of genetic variation in off-spring. 

Now I am not a proponent of macro-evolutionary theory as espoused by Darwin, there is no demonstrable scientific evidence at all that one species transforms into another. But on the micro-level (within a species or genus) variation is obvious and easily observed. And it is a well known fact that at this level genetic variation offers a wide range of benefits versus a “pure”, highly restricted, or narrow genetic line. Homogenous genetic lines produce all kinds of defects and problems that varied genetic lines tend to weed out. The mutt is far healthier and probably more capable than the purebred. Just the truth of the matter.

Therefore I want to coin a term that will speak to the many advantages of poly-genus (that gives me a sort of preliminary idea to work with, poly-genius). I want to avoid the term miscere altogether, and possibly the term genus, because although they are perfectly good and descriptive Latin terms (if you think about it the very term miscegenation itself is a perfectly good and positive invented term, it was only turned askew by modern liberal and democratic political aims) they have now become corrupted by false use and bad application.

In other words the term miscegenation might have easily had at least as many positive denotations and connotations as negative ones, but because of Democratic political aims the term became entirely negative in both denotation and connotation. (Yet another obvious example of how modern liberal political aims distort even the very language in an attempt to promote their insane and misbred theories.)
So I’m going to try and avoid the terms genus (at least directly) and miscere (to mix).
What I want to emphasize instead is genetic variation, advantage, and benefits.

Now I don’t want to create a term with overt political implications. To promote the idea that interracial marriage is the only way to achieve genetic variation, or that all genetic variation is good, is both a silly and preposterous idea. It is also unscientific, it is merely a political aim dressed up as science, as disastrously occurs so often nowadays. Every good thing is somehow degraded and defined downward to serve a twisted political aim.

But what I do want to do is create a term that shows that not only is miscegenation (the mixing of genotypes) not a bad thing (remove the liberal political smear and it is primarily a good and healthy thing that promotes advantageous genetic variation, adaptability, and the multiplication of capabilities) but that it is potentially a great thing. A beneficial thing.

(As another sidenote I would not actively promote the idea of interracial marriage and miscegenation, even though I have such a marriage and have such children, as a standard that society should legally, politically, or socially pursue, but rather as a condition that society is likely to benefit from when it occurs. Human relations are far too complex and marriage is far too sacred an institution to me to have government involved in encouraging or demanding who marries who or who produce offspring with who. For government to politically promote interracial marriage is as bad an idea as it is for Democrats to have tried to suppress it. Government should be entirely restricted from the human procreation business. Rather it should be what it is and society should take advantage of the benefits as they arise as a natural course of events.

So the best term I’ve developed so far is polygenius, though that doesn’t really convey all of the elements of the term I wish to create. 

Anyway I am open to suggestions about developing such a term to replace miscegenation. Not because I hate the term miscegenation, I don't, it just means “genetic mixing (the underlying implication being race-mixing and that race mixing is bad because liberals are race-obsessed so any race mixing just naturally has to be bad),” but what I do very much dislike is when people take terms and totally corrupt them for personal political agendas and then further bastardize a word for some evil purpose.


Maybe it is because I’m a writer, maybe because I despise modern liberal politics and its insidious goals, maybe it is because accurate definitions mean much to me, maybe just because it is unjust and juvenile, but I really can’t stomach that kind of twisting of history and backward-minded shit. Especially directed at my English language. 

By the way, this idea, that genetic variation and mixed marriage produces beneficial genetic variation and “polygenius” is sort of a recurring theme in my own writings, fictional and non-fictional, so I have that as an ulterior motive as well. 

I just think it is time I coined a phrase to encapsulate what I mean so I don’t have to keep re-explaining the idea over and over again. 

Everyone is free to comment and I'll consider everyone's suggestions.
______________________________________________________


Etymological history

Miscegenation comes from the Latin miscere, "to mix" and genus, "kind". The word was coined in the U.S. in 1863, and the etymology of the word is tied up with political conflicts during the American Civil War over the abolition of slavery and over the racial segregation of African-Americans. The reference to genus was made to emphasize the supposedly distinct biological differences between whites and non-whites, though all humans belong to the same genus, Homo, and the same species, Homo sapiens.

The word was coined in an anonymous propaganda pamphlet published in New York City in December 1863, during the American Civil War. The pamphlet was entitled Miscegenation: The Theory of the Blending of the Races, Applied to the American White Man and Negro.[5] It purported to advocate the intermarriage of whites and blacks until they were indistinguishably mixed, as a desirable goal, and further asserted that this was the goal of the Republican Party. The pamphlet was a hoax, concocted by Democrats, to discredit the Republicans by imputing to them what were then radical views that offended against the attitudes of the vast majority of whites, including those who opposed slavery. There was already much opposition to the war effort.

The pamphlet and variations on it were reprinted widely in both the north and south by Democrats and Confederates. Only in November 1864 was the pamphlet exposed as a hoax. The hoax pamphlet was written by David Goodman Croly, managing editor of the New York World, a Democratic Party paper, and George Wakeman, a World reporter.

By then, the word miscegenation had entered the common language of the day as a popular buzzword in political and social discourse. The issue of miscegenation, raised by the opponents of Abraham Lincoln, featured prominently in the election campaign of 1864.

In the United States, miscegenation has referred primarily to the intermarriage between whites and non-whites, especially blacks.

Before the publication of Miscegenation, the word amalgamation, borrowed from metallurgy, had been in use as a general term for ethnic and racial intermixing. A contemporary usage of this metaphor was that of Ralph Waldo Emerson's private vision in 1845 of America as an ethnic and racial smelting-pot, a variation on the concept of the melting pot. Opinions in the U.S on the desirability of such intermixing, including that between white Protestants and Irish Catholic immigrants, were divided. The term miscegenation was coined to refer specifically to the intermarriage of blacks and whites, with the intent of galvanising opposition to the war.
_________________________________________________


irregular < Latin miscē(re) to mix + gen(us) race, stock, species + -ation; allegedly coined by U.S. journalist David Goodman Croly (1829-89) in a pamphlet published anonymously in 1864

Thursday, September 29, 2011

What Should Be, and What Actually is...

What the Federal government can and should and must do if it is to survive, (and frankly I don't care if it does) and to encourage Capitalism, Free Enterprise, and the Building of Wealth among American Citizens:

1. Lower Rates of Taxation, at both the Corporate and Individual Levels, and abolish many forms of taxation, such as Social Security taxes, institute a fair tax or consumption tax, and thereafter encourage the development of just and beneficial allodial and fee-free tax systems.

2. Abolish much of government.

3. Spend far less on government.

4. Assist in educating Private Citizens and the entire Society on the advantages of Capitalism, Free Enterprise, Private Industry and Individual Wealth Building, and how these things are actually accomplished (versus the socialistic and communistic principles now being taught as pseudo-science and distorted macro-economics in Federally supported public schools and universities).

5. Abolish many forms of regulation, and severely curtail many other forms of regulation to the lowest possible level in order to still maintain acceptable safety protocols, as well as abolishing subsidies to industry.

6. Eradicate Social Security and all others forms of failed socialistic economic policies and instead replace these with tax incentives and education programs to encourage and develop individual savings and investment and insurance accounts.

7. Abolish Public Education at the Federal level.

8. Return the Federal government to its necessary and very limited functions. Acknowledge and eradicate its numerous and unnecessary losses, rather than encouraging and subsidizing constant and continual states of failure.

9. Employ far fewer people at far less pay and benefits (especially at the Congressional, Court, and Administrative levels), see itself as a Service Oriented and temporary Career or Profession, rather than as a permanent and fixed political class (America should be political-class-free) and a personal benefits industry and life-long occupation. Government is not a "calling," service in government is a calling. But government is not, and should never be, a life-long enterprise. It is public service, not life-long employment at Public Expense. Americans are not Imperial-era Romans, and neither should we be run like a Third World Banana Republic. To this end it is also extremely necessary to institute Tort and Court reform.

10. Actually become Pro Business, Capitalism, Free Enterprise, Industry, and Private Wealth Creation, as well as becoming Self-Limited and self-limiting, and self-disciplined.


What the Federal Government actually does:

1. Seeks any and every opportunity to raise tax rates and to increase the bureaucratic tax burden.

2. Seeks constantly to grow itself at the expense of the nation, the culture, and the People.

3. Seeks constantly to spend more, and to bankrupt itself, the nation, and the American People.

4. Seeks constantly to engage in Socialistic Care-taking policies like Social Security, subsidizing failed enterprises, and seizing control of whole industries like the Medical and Defense Industries.

5. Seeks constantly to increase the regulatory burden of government on every sector of the economy, finance, and enterprise, and even on individual behavior even when the evidence is clear that such regulations cripple or destroy market and national competition and entire sectors of industry and the economy.

6. Constantly grows socialistic programs while at the same time funding them by means that would in every other circumstance be considered illegal and immoral, while suppressing the development of Individual Business and Saving and Investing and Charity and Philanthropy incentives and programs that would actually work, both societally and financially.

7. Constantly fails to educate most people, at great and ever increasing public expense, and the educational efforts it does operate are inefficient and more often than not outright erroneous and inaccurate.

8. Constantly seeks to enlarge and spread its creeping, corrupting, and nefarious influence into all aspects of American life and culture. Continually excuses and subsidizes its own abysmal rates of failure, moral and financial bankruptcy, and horrendous and miserable acts of unrepentant incompetence.

9. Seeks constantly to swell its rank of employees, dependants, unionized collectives, and supporters to give its gargantuan and bloated bulk an apparent and superficial legitimacy it does not really enjoy.

10. Engages in constant acts of sabotage, injury, regulatory destruction, and burdensome taxation and exhaustion against Individual and Corporate acts of Business, Capital Accumulation, Charity and Philanthropy, Free Enterprise, Market Development, Productive Industry, and Private Ownership and Wealth Creation.

Digg! 
Save This Page

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Saturday, August 14, 2010

The Nature of Work and Productivity

Pesharim - The Nature of Work and Productivity


Work is a subject upon which I have spent much time, labor, and effort (pun intended). I have also spent much time studying Work, how it operates, how to improve my own productivity and the productivity of others, what it achieves, what the limitations of work may be, and so forth. Work is also a subject very dear to my heart, for I think Work is an extremely important aspect of human life. One of the fundamental aspects.

That being the case I'll present my own views about Work and productivity, which have changed over time as I've experimented with different work methods and with different means to increase my own productivity. Now I have to first admit, in the interest of fairness, that I do many different kinds of work and that each different kind of work may require a different method of efficiency and action (as regards the particular details). I suspect that is true for everyone, no matter what kind of work they do.

So, that being said, here are my general observations about work, how to be more productive, and the relationship between vacation and occupation.


1. People are supposed to spend far more time working than they are entertaining themselves. Or being entertained. That seems counter-intuitive in modern society, but it is true.

2. Most of the time it is better to work than to be entertained. Work is good for people and part of the expression of their soul, it is not just something you do for cash. If it is something you just do for cash you're in the wrong line of work. (Nothing wrong with money, I'm not saying that, but money is just one kind of motivation for doing good work, it should not be the only motivation for doing good work.)

3. Good work is good for you, bad work is bad for you. Seems self-evident but you'd be surprised the people that never figure this out.

4. A certain percentage of your work time should be spent in a relaxed and casual mode, this helps you to problem solve, and then again a certain percentage of your time should be spent in a very serious even stressful mode - this helps you to focus and concentrate on the task. Percentages of work-mode activity will probably vary by individual.

5. Socializing all of the time at work makes you less productive and lazy. Socializing efficiently, or a certain percentage of the time, probably makes you more, not less, efficient. No man is an island, but no man should be nothing more than a social butterfly either. If you want to be a social butterfly, be that on your own time. At work socialize efficiently and casually, not obsessively and constantly.

6. Vacations are vital to help you recover from the stress of long or extended work periods. Take them, in moderation. I think a lot about work when on vacation, then again for some of my work, like writing and inventing, vacations are perfect times to get new ideas and to take notes. This doesn't bother me at all, and makes my vacations far more enjoyable to me. But if you don't wanna think about work at all on vacation, then don't. But take vacations when you can. They are good for you. They help you recuperate and regain your energy and focus. They generate new ideas. They allow you to travel. They are beneficial. In moderation. Like wine is good for you in moderation. But drink all the time and you're a lush and a drunk. Vacation constantly and you do nothing more than avoid work constantly. You're slothful.

7. The same is true for entertainment. There is nothing wrong with entertainment. Enjoying yourself is very good for you. But there is something very, very wrong with the modern idea that you must be entertained at all moments of the day and night, even at work. Let a certain part of each day be reserved for entertainment. Otherwise do your work. And work before entertainment, certainly not the other way around. That's laziness and lack of ambition.

8. Relaxation is good for you. A certain percentage of your time should be devoted to relaxation, to hobbies, personal enjoyments. Relaxation is like a mini-vacation you can take each day or week. In moderation of course, but nevertheless such time periods are very good for you. And they are good for the people around you, and they are excellent times to associate and socialize with others freely and without restriction. Your main socializing times should be during periods of relaxation, vacation, and entertainment. Not during work cycles.

9. The proper amounts of rest, sleep, entertainment, relaxation, vacation, exercise and sex will all improve your productivity. Suppression of these things tends to make you less efficient, less effective, and less productive. A good diet will also certainly improve your overall efficiency. A bad diet will make you stupid, slow, inefficient and unproductive. Improper amounts, and improper kinds, of anything decrease or suppress productivity. Proper amounts, and the proper kinds of most things, make you far more productive. Proper and improper amounts probably vary by individual. And by period. At least in some matters. (I.e. Everyone needs necessary levels of water and air to live, not everyone needs the same levels of exercise, sleep, or sex.)

10. Self-disciple is more important to high levels of productivity than is discipline inflicted by outside forces. Self-discipline is the one virtue without which no-one can ever be truly efficient or highly productive. So cultivate it as an operating principle in your own life. If you desire to work well or do important work.

11. Everyone should experiment with different methods and techniques for improving their own productivity and work capabilities. Adopt those principles which work best, discard inefficient and ineffective techniques and methods. I'd say the same is true in every area of your life. Too much of life is spent wasted pursuing ineffective and bad techniques for work, in relationships, even in entertainment. Experiment, and if something is a failure discard it, if something works then adopt it, and if something works modestly then improve it.

12. Seek out work which makes you happy and which is of benefit and profit not only to yourself but to the rest of the world. You'll be glad you did, and so will others.

13. You're not wedded to the same work or job for your whole life. If you're dissatisfied with your work then improve your current work, find another occupation, make your own work, or start your own business. That might be nearly impossible in some parts of the world, but probably not for you. What prevents you from being satisfied with your work is you. Plain and simple. Everything else is just excuse making. You might not find or make satisfactory and enjoyable work overnight (that rarely happens), but you sure as hell won't find it sitting on your furry and flea-bitten tail howling at the moon about it. Risk scouts the way, complaint kills the day.

14. Variety is very important to satisfaction in work involving constant change and new challenges. Consistency is very important as regards repetitive work. The quality and productivity of your work will be determined to a large extent by your individual nature. If your nature naturally seeks variety, seek out work involving constant change. If you have a nature that desires stability and consistency, seek out work that does not change much. Fit your work to your nature, and your nature to your work. As much as possible. Levels of variation between stability and change will fluctuate over time.

15. Schedule yourself and generally speaking you will be more productive. Allow a certain level of flexibility in your schedule, but stone by stone lain rightly builds the mighty coliseum. Better to do a little well every day, than to attempt to drink up the ocean overnight. You will have to make both sacrifices and efforts for work. The disciplining of time is the disciplining of actual achievement. Fail to discipline your time and time escapes you. And time escaped cannot be recaptured.

16. Failure is the best method of learning what won't work. Yet you'd be surprised at the people who either stubbornly won't learn that lesson, or never bother to notice it. Yet it directly affects your real productivity.

17. Be yourself, and your work will flourish. Be what you are not, and your work will fail.

18. Your work is important. If it isn't something is definitely wrong with either your work, with you, or with both.

19. Work should be a natural part of your life and soul. So look first at your life and soul and this will help you determine what work is best for you to pursue. When your work is an extension of your own soul, you will love your work. When your work suppresses your soul, that is totally unnatural and counter-productive. I do not consider my work as being separate from my family, my friends, my community, state, nation, the world, or God. Rather my work integrates with all of these either things. As it should. That is the good way. It should not be the uncommon way.

20. Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy. Whatever your Sabbath, keep one day devoted to being vacated from work, and to pursuing other things that are just as important (if not more-so) as work, such as family, home, your soul, and God. Working at your own soul will not only make you far more productive, it will make you a far better person. Work is supposed to make the world better, working at your own soul will make you better.

To me these are the most important general principles of work and productivity.

Digg! Save This Page